AITA for switching my roommate’s ADHD medication with placebos for months so he would fail his exams, drop out, and move out, leaving me the cheap apartment?

Alright, folks, buckle up, because today's AITA submission is one that genuinely made my jaw hit the floor. We've seen stories of petty roommate squabbles, silent battles over chores, and even some truly bizarre living arrangements, but this one takes the cake in a way that feels less like a disagreement and more like a calculated act of sabotage. It delves into a realm of ethical questions that are deeply unsettling and frankly, quite shocking to consider. \nThis isn

"AITA for switching my roommate's ADHD medication with placebos for months so he would fail his exams, drop out, and move out, leaving me the cheap apartment?"







This story, submitted by David, presents a profoundly disturbing ethical dilemma that extends far beyond the typical roommate conflict. The act of intentionally tampering with another person's prescribed medication, regardless of whether it's swapped for placebos or something more harmful, is a grave breach of trust and a severe violation of personal autonomy. Benjamin, David's roommate, relied on his medication for his academic and personal well-being, and David deliberately undermined that for his own gain. \nThe impact on Benjamin's life is catastrophic. He not only failed academically but also experienced a significant decline in his mental health, leading to depression and a loss of self-worth. This isn't merely about failing exams; it's about the erosion of his self-confidence, the derailment of his career aspirations, and potentially long-lasting psychological trauma. David actively observed Benjamin's suffering and consciously perpetuated it, feigning sympathy while executing his malicious plan. \nFrom a legal perspective, David's actions could have serious ramifications. Tampering with medication, even if it's replaced with placebos, can be considered a form of assault or a felony depending on jurisdiction and intent. While Benjamin wasn't physically harmed by the placebos themselves, the psychological and academic damage inflicted is immense. David's calculated deception involved pre-meditation and a clear intent to cause harm to achieve a personal benefit. \nUltimately, this situation goes far beyond typical
The Internet's Verdict: A Moral Compass in Chaos?
The comments section for this particular AITA story is predictably explosive, with an overwhelming consensus that David is, unequivocally, the asshole. Users are not just calling him out for being selfish, but for engaging in a deeply malicious and potentially criminal act. The themes of betrayal, lack of empathy, and premeditated harm are recurring throughout the discussion, highlighting the community's collective outrage at such a calculated scheme. \nMany commenters are focusing on the devastating impact on Benjamin's life, from his academic failure to his mental health crisis, pointing out that David's actions have long-term consequences far beyond just getting a cheaper apartment. The discussion also touches upon the legal ramifications, with several users urging Benjamin, should he ever discover the truth, to pursue legal action against David for his manipulative and harmful behavior.





In conclusion, David's actions in this AITA story are not just problematic but represent a severe breach of trust and a calculated act of malice. The community's response is a resounding condemnation, highlighting the profound ethical and potentially legal ramifications of his choices. While the allure of cheap rent might seem strong, destroying another person's academic future and mental well-being for personal gain crosses a line that few would argue is acceptable. This tale serves as a stark reminder of how far some will go, and the devastating consequences that follow.









